Page 132 - ES 2020-21_Volume-1-2 [28-01-21]
P. 132

Does India’s Sovereign Credit Rating reflect its fundamentals No!  115


             in explaining India’s sovereign credit ratings downgrades during 1998-2019. Only consumer
             price inflation is found significant in explaining India’s sovereign credit ratings upgrades during
             1998-2019.

                           Table 6:  Probit Regression Credit Ratings Downgrade and Upgrade
                                                            (1)                          (2)

                                                    Dependant variable:          Dependant variable:
              VARIABLES                          Credit Rating Downgrade       Credit Rating Upgrade

              Real GDP Growth                            -0.0036                       0.0135
                                                         (0.0274)                      (0.0219)
              Fiscal Deficit                             1.422***                      -0.135
                                                         (0.520)                       (0.108)
              Consumer Price Inflation                   0.150**                       -0.391***
                                                         (0.0747)                      (0.104)
              Constant                                   -14.72***                     2.356**
                                                         (4.777)                       (0.938)
              Observations                               84                            84
              Wald chi2 (3)                              9.325                         16.47
              Prob > chi2                                0.0253                        0.0009
              Pseudo R2                                  0.4257                        0.2334
             Robust standard errors in parentheses
             *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1

             POLICY IMPLICATIONS

             3.54  The Survey questioned whether India’s sovereign credit ratings reflect its fundamentals,
             and found evidence of a systemic under-assessment of India’s fundamentals as reflected in its
             low ratings over a period of at least two decades. India’s fiscal policy must, therefore, not remain
             beholden to such a noisy/biased measure of India’s fundamentals and should instead reflect
             Gurudev Rabindranath Thakur’s sentiment of a mind without fear. In other words, India’s fiscal
             policy should be guided by considerations of growth and development rather than be restrained
             by biased and subjective sovereign credit ratings.

             3.55  While sovereign credit ratings do not reflect the Indian economy’s fundamentals, noisy,
             opaque  and  biased  credit  ratings  damage  FPI  flows.  Sovereign  credit  ratings  methodology
             must be amended to reflect economies’ ability and willingness to pay their debt obligations by
             becoming more transparent and less subjective. Developing economies must come together to
             address this bias and subjectivity inherent in sovereign credit ratings methodology to prevent
             exacerbation of crises in future.


             3.56  The pro-cyclical nature of credit ratings and its potential adverse impact on economies,
             especially low-rated developing economies must be expeditiously addressed. India has already
             raised the issue of pro-cyclicality of credit ratings in G20. In response, the Financial Stability Board
             (FSB) is now focusing on assessing the pro-cyclicality of credit rating downgrades.
   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137