Page 140 - ES 2020-21_Volume-1-2 [28-01-21]
P. 140

Inequality and Growth: Conflict or Convergence?  123


             redistributive objectives are unimportant, but that redistribution is only feasible in a developing
             economy if the size of the economic pie grows. In sum, for a developing country such as India,
             where the growth potential is high and the scope for poverty reduction is also significant, the
             focus must continue on growing the size of the economic pie rapidly at least for the foreseeable
             future.

             GROWTH, INEQUALITY, AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC OUTCOMES:
             INDIA VERSUS THE ADVANCED ECONOMIES

             4.4  In the advanced economies, Wilkinson and Pickett (2009), Atkinson (2014) and Piketty
             (2020) show that higher inequality leads to adverse socio-economic outcomes but income per
             capita, a measure of economic growth, has little impact. This section examines whether these
             findings apply to India. For this purpose, Figures 1-7 display simultaneously the correlation of
             socio-economic outcomes with inequality and income per capita across advanced economies
             and across Indian states. In each figure, the top panel displays these correlations for the Indian
             states  while  the  bottom  panel  displays  the  same  for  the  advanced  economies;  the  chart  on
             the left displays the correlation with inequality while the chart on the right displays the same
             with income per capita. These figures demonstrate clearly across a range of socio-economic
             outcomes the stark contrast between India and the advanced economies in the correlation of
             socio-economic outcomes with inequality and income per capita. Across the Indian states, it is
             observed that both inequality and income per capita correlate similarly with socio-economic
             outcomes. In these figures, inequality across Indian states is measured as the Gini coefficient of
             consumption. As it is demonstrated in the Appendix to the chapter, the results remain robust to
             using other measures of inequality.

             4.5  Figure 1 shows clearly  that  the index of health  outcomes  correlates  positively  with
             both inequality and income per capita across the Indian states. However, across the advanced
             economies, inequality correlates negatively with the index of health and social outcomes while
             income per capita correlates positively. Thus, while the conflict between growth and inequality
             is clearly seen across the advanced economies, inequality and growth converge in their effects
             on health among Indian states. Figures 2-5 show the same result using the index of education,
             life expectancy, infant mortality and crime respectively. It is clearly evident from Figure 6 that
             neither inequality nor income per capita among Indian states correlate strongly with drug usage;
             however, inequality correlates strongly with drug usage in the advanced economies. On mental
             health, Figure 7 shows that the effects of inequality and income per capita remain similar across
             the Indian states and the advanced economies.
   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145