Page 557 - ES 2020-21_Volume-1-2 [28-01-21]
P. 557

184     Economic Survey 2020-21   Volume 2



                mainly supply driven and therefore not a monetary phenomenon. Theoretical work in
                the area has used models with price and/or wage stickiness to show that targeting core
                inflation maximizes welfare. When prices are sticky, mark-ups fluctuate and therefore
                also distort relative prices. In these models, the flexible price equilibrium is restored
                by  central  banks  trying  to  minimize  these  fluctuations  by  targeting  sticky  prices.
                Much of the literature assumes that markets are complete, allowing households to
                fully insure against idiosyncratic risks. However, in the case of developing economies
                there are two deviations from these assumptions: 1) inability of agents to smooth their
                lifetime consumption, and 2) other structural differences such as a high share of food in
                household consumption expenditure (Anand et al., 2015). Anand et al. (2015) contend
                that while under complete markets, the choice of targeting strict core inflation is the
                best policy, with incomplete markets, headline inflation targeting is welfare improving
                relative  to  core  inflation  targeting.  However,  using  a  setup  similar  to Anand  et  al.
                (2015), Portillo et al. (2016) find that core (non-food) inflation stabilisation is very
                close to optimal even in the case of an economy with credit constrained consumers.
                Portillo et al. (2016) find that an optimal measure of inflation targeting should provide
                very low weight to food inflation. This weighting is much lower than the weightage
                of food in Headline CPI. A recent RBI working paper (Nadhanael, 2020), analyses
                weekly price data on 45 food items in India, for the period 2005-18, from the data
                collected by the Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Ministry of Agriculture and
                Farmers Welfare. The paper finds heterogeneity in the extent of price stickiness among
                food products. The prices of food items change, on average, in 1.29 months. Vegetable
                prices change at higher frequency than others (almost twice a month on average), price
                of pulses changes thrice almost every 2 months, the price of milk changes once in five
                months, and prices of eggs, meat and fish change on average once a month, prices of
                cereals change once almost every three and a half months. Given this finding of wide
                variations in the price stickiness of food items, the paper suggests that it is important
                to pay attention to the sticky component of food inflation in addition to core inflation.



             INFLATION EXPECTATIONS

             5.29  The one year ahead inflation expectation for CPI-C inflation has risen during the current
             year. As per the business inflation expectations survey of Indian Institute of Management (IIM)
             Ahmedabad, one year ahead inflation expectations for CPI-C inflation slightly rose from 4.0
             per cent in February 2020 to 4.4 per cent in October 2020. Inflation expectations survey of
             households conducted by RBI also pointed to a slight rise in inflation expectations from 9.1
             per cent in March 2020 to 9.7 per cent in November 2020, though it was lower compared to
             September 2020. The movement in the inflation expectations have been roughly in the direction
             of movement of the current inflation rate as measured by CPI-C (Figure 21). This has an important
             implication with respect to the CPI-C being an important metric for monetary policy. Owing to
             being a metric of price change that households can relate to it targeting headline inflation can
             anchor inflation expectations.
   552   553   554   555   556   557   558   559   560   561   562