Page 92 - ES 2020-21_Volume-1-2 [28-01-21]
P. 92

Does Growth Lead to Debt Sustainability? Yes, But Not Vice-Versa!  75


                26c. Minimum real growth rate from FY22,       26d. Maximum interest rate from FY 22,
                      above which debt is sustainable               below which debt is sustainable

























             Source: RBI, MoSPI, Survey Estimates
             Note: g: nominal growth rate
             Figure 31 c and 31 d show that for a given level of sustainable debt, the IRGD will remain negative

             2.40  The results depicted in Figure 26a suggest that in a worst case scenario where the real
             growth is only 4 per cent in the next 10 years, public debt is sustainable. The results in Figure
             26b-d also show that even at high primary deficits, low real growth and high nominal interest
             rates, India’s debt will remain sustainable.

             POLiCY iMPLiCATiONS

             2.41  As argued above, the Covid-19 pandemic has created a significant negative shock to
             demand. The various costs of financial distress that firms face even before potential bankruptcy
             (Andrade and Kaplan (1998), Hotchkiss et al. (2008), Senbet and Wang (2010)) combined with
             possible firm bankruptcies in a choked bankruptcy system, on the one hand, and the possibility
             that jobs lost during the lockdown may not get fully retrieved, on the other hand, create the
             possibility  of  economic  hysteresis  that  must  be  avoided  at  all  costs.  The  World  Economic
             Outlook (October 2020) edition highlights this in the case of India (see Figure 27). To eliminate
             the possibility of growth being impacted in the medium to long run, the Government has been
             extremely pro-active in launching several seminal reforms. However, their impact will manifest
             in the medium to long-term. To ensure that the economy remains in good health to avail the full
             benefit of these significant reforms, the “economic bridge” to the medium and long-term has to
             be created. Only an active fiscal policy – one that recognises that the risks from doing too little
             are much more than the risks from doing too much – can ensure that this “economic bridge” is
             well laid out.
             2.42  Central to this change in policy stance is the recognition that if we apply the old framework
             to  today’s  reality,  if  we  fail  to  stimulate  the  economy,  we  risk  the  temporary  weakness  in
             demand leading to lower potential growth (Blanchard et al. 2015).  With the IRGD expected to
             be significantly negative for India in the foreseeable future, pro-cyclical fiscal policies may lead
             to higher, not lower, debt/GDP ratios.
   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97