Page 322 - ES 2020-21_Volume-1-2 [28-01-21]
P. 322

JAY Ho: Ayushman Bharat's Jan  Arogya Yojana (JAY) and Health Outcomes  305


             9.44  PM-JAY has helped the Indian states in achieving reduced infant and child mortality rates
             (Figure 19). Neonatal mortality rate (NNMR) declined by 22 per cent in the states that adopted
             PM-JAY in comparison to a 16 per cent decline in states that did not adopt PM-JAY, an increment
             of 6 per cent for states that adopted PM-JAY versus those that did not. Similarly, the reduction in
             Infant mortality rate (IMR) was 20 per cent vis-à-vis 12 per cent in PM-JAY and non-PM-JAY
             states respectively, an increment of 8 per cent for states that adopted PM-JAY versus those that
             did not. While the Under-five mortality rate (U5MR) recorded a decline of 19 per cent in PM-
             JAY states, it reduced by 14 per cent in the non-PM-JAY states, an increment of 5 per cent for
             states that adopted PM-JAY versus those that did not.

                      Figure 19: Infant and Child Mortality Rates (per 1,000 live births): All States
























                  Source: National Family Health Survey (NFHS) 4 and 5


             9.45  The data on the use of distinct family planning measures represents that PM-JAY has
             enabled an increased access to family planning in the Indian states. While the proportion of
             people ensuring family planning rose across all the states between the two surveys, the increase
             is much more significant in the states that adopted PM-JAY indicating its effectiveness. For
             example; the proportion of people currently using any method of family planning rose by 15
             per cent in the PM-JAY adopted states and only by 7 per cent (less than half) in the other states
             (Figure 20).

             9.46  Further, the PM-JAY has warranted a notable reduction in the unmet need of family
             planning for the currently married women in the age group of 15-49 years. While the proportion
             of women with total unmet family planning needs i.e. the proportion of women who are fertile
             and desire to either terminate or postpone childbearing, but are not currently using any method
             of contraception decreased by 31 per cent in the PM-JAY states, the decline in the non-PM-
             JAY states was merely 10 per cent.  Similarly, the proportion of women with unmet need
             for spacing i.e. women who wish to postpone their next birth by a specified length of time,
             reduced by 31 per cent in the PM-JAY states and by only 15 per cent in the non-PM-JAY states
             (Figure 21).
   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327