Page 658 - ES 2020-21_Volume-1-2 [28-01-21]
P. 658

Industry and Infrastructure  285



                         Box 4: Rationale for the revision in the definition of MSMEs:
                             Details of the deliberations on issues affecting MSMEs

               The Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development (MSMED) Act, 2006 had defined MSMEs
               on the basis of investment in plant and machinery or equipment. Such investment was to be calculated
               at the original price thereof. This had disadvantaged the sector as it disincentivized investment and
               prevented the MSMEs to reap the benefits of economies of scale and contribute more significantly to
               employment generation. In June-2020, GoI revised the investment limits upwards and also included
               annual turnover of the enterprise as the additional criteria for the classification of MSMEs. The
               calculation of such investment would now be linked to the Income Tax Return as filed under the IT
               Act, thus allowing for annual depreciation.
               The  need  for  the  revision  in  the  MSME  definition  was  carefully  evaluated  and  announced  after
               stakeholders’ consultation and due diligence in accordance with the provision of MSMED Act, 2006.
               The Economic Survey (2012-13 and 2018-19) highlighted the concerns and issues in the MSME
               sector and the need for revamping the ecosystem for the MSMEs. The GoI had also attempted to
               amend the MSME Act in 2015 and 2018 to boost the MSME sector. The 2015 Bill proposed an
               upward revision in investment ceiling limits whereas the 2018 Bill attempted to replace investment
               criteria with turnover criteria and remove the distinction between manufacturing and services.

               The Department-Related Parliamentary Standing Committee (DRPSC) on Industry (2015) adopted
               the 268  report which contains the recommendations regarding adoption of the Bill, without any
                     th
               change. The Committee had in its 245  Report extensively examined the implementation of the
                                                  th
               MSMED Act, 2006 and had given recommendations pertaining to Chapters IV and V of the parent
               Act. The Committee had generally agreed to enhance the investment limits for the classification of
               MSME sector in view of inflation. It had observed: “Considering the inflation and dynamic market
               situation, the Committee feels that definition of MSMEs as provided in the Act may be revised every
               five years.”
               Committee of Secretaries in its meeting held on 11.11.2016 recommended addition of “turnover”
               and/or  “employment”  as  criteria  for  defining  MSMEs. After  the  deliberation,  the  2015  Bill  was
               withdrawn and the 2018 Bill was introduced on 23.07.2018.
               The DRPSC on Industry (2018), carefully evaluated the 2018 Bill and had mentioned in the report
               that the “classification based on investment in plant and machinery has a number of disadvantages as
               it prevents MSMEs to become competitive in the market, inhibits investment to modernize, upscale,
               improve productivity and technology upgradation due to rigor of investment thresholds.’’
               The  DRPSC  report  (2018)  further  mentions:  ‘…the  extent  of  financial  limits  fixed  in  2006  for
               MSMEs are no longer relevant, given the impact of inflation. Most of the Industry Associations and
               stakeholders have, therefore express the need for changing the present criteria of investment in plant
               and machinery to annual turnover as criterion for classification of MSMEs.’
               The DRPSC report (2018) also says: ‘…the problem with employment criteria in the Indian context is
               the non-availability of reliable/verifiable sectoral data and the seasonal variance in labour engagement.
               The employment system, if taken into consideration, will increase the need for inspection, which will
               involve huge transaction cost and could place a question mark on the veracity of the figures given
               by the enterprises in different Sectors. Moreover, it will also lead to large number of litigations.’ The
               2018 Bill lapsed on dissolution of the Sixteenth Lok Sabha on 25.05.2019.
   653   654   655   656   657   658   659   660   661   662   663