Page 81 - ES 2020-21_Volume-1-2 [28-01-21]
P. 81

64      Economic Survey 2020-21   Volume 1



                      Box 6: CAuSALiTY TESTS ON PANEL DATA OF EMEs AND
                                           ADVANCED ECONOMiES


                To confirm the direction of causality using formal statistical tests, pairwise Dumitrescu Hurlin
                Panel Causality Test was carried for the sample of EMEs and advanced economies. The test
                allows the coefficients to be different across countries. This test simply runs standard Granger
                Causality regressions for each cross-section individually. The lag order is assumed to be identical
                for all countries.
                The test finds evidence of causality from Growth to Debt for the sample of EMEs. However, for
                the sample of Advanced countries, the test is not able to establish any causal relationship between
                Change in debt-to-GDP and growth.
               Sample 1- Emerging market Economies         Sample 2- Advanced economies

               Time period: 1981-2018 (Unbalanced)         Time period: 1981-2018
               Countries:  India,  China,  Indonesia,  Malaysia,  Countries:  Canada,  France,  Germany,  Greece,
               Thailand, Philippines, Vietnam, Turkey.     Italy, Spain, UK, USA, Japan
               H : Real growth rate does not cause Change in   H : Real growth rate does not cause Change in
                                                             0
                 0
               Debt/GDP for all cross sections.            Debt/GDP for all cross sections.
               Rejected at 5%  level of significance       Not rejected.

               H : Change in Debt/GDP does not cause Real   H : Change in Debt/GDP does not cause Real
                                                             0
                 0
               growth rate for all cross sections.         growth rate for all cross sections.
               Not rejected                                Not rejected.










               Data source: IMF


             CROwDiNG OuT DuE TO PuBLiC EXPENDiTuRE?

             2.21  So far, we have established a clear direction of causality between growth and debt for
             countries where the growth rates are high; specifically, growth leads to debt sustainability and
             not vice versa in these countries. This direction of causality is, however, not clear in the case of
             countries where the growth rate is low. This is because higher growth enables the IRGD to be
             negative and thereby ensuring debt sustainability. We now examine the potential mechanisms
             that explain behind the causal effect from growth to debt sustainability and not vice versa for
             India.

             2.22  Conceptually,  the  plausible  link  from  higher  incremental  debt  to  lower  growth  rate
             is  based  on  potential  crowding  out  of  private  investment  and  the  Ricardian  Equivalence
             Proposition (REP). REP states that forward-looking consumers, who are also assumed to be
   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86