Page 46 - ES 2020-21_Volume-1-2 [28-01-21]
P. 46

Saving Lives and Livelihoods Amidst a Once-in-a-Century Crisis  29


             V-SHAPED ECONOMIC RECOVERY DUE TO TIMELY STRINGENT
             LOCKDOWN
             1.42  Evidence from the experience of Spanish flu establishes that cities that intervened with lockdowns
             earlier and more aggressively experience stronger recovery in economic front in the long run.  Learning
             from this experience, India implemented an early and stringent lockdown from late March to May to
             curb the pace of spread of COVID-19.  With the economy brought to a standstill for two complete
             months, the inevitable effect was a 23.9 per cent contraction in GDP as compared to previous year’s
             quarter. This contraction was consistent with the stringency of the lockdown (Figure 26).

                 Figure 26: Correlation between Stringency and GDP Contraction during Apr-June, 2020


























             Source: Compiled from various sources
             Note: Bubble size corresponds to number of deaths as on 31  December, 2020; number of deaths per lakh indicated
                                                            st
             with the bubble
             1.43  The economy was gradually unlocked since June, 2020 and has experienced a V-shaped
             recovery since then. An attempt has been made to capture the impact of the stringency of lockdown
             on high-frequency indicators of economic activity States across India. The contemporaneous as
             well as lagged impact of change in stringency of lockdown across States on month-on-month
             growth of varied economic indicators from time period since unlock begins i.e., from June to
             October has been studied (Box 7). The state-wide Stringency Index as detailed in Box 4 has
             been used for the analysis. It may be noted that April and May had similar stringency across
             States as mandated by Central Government.

                        Box 7: Using First-Differences to Avoid Spurious Correlations

              Time series data on various economic indicators commonly exhibit a trend effect i.e., to grow over
              time
              Example: y  = α 0 +  1  +  t                 t
                                α t e , t = 1, 2, ... where e  represents errors that are i.i.d., independent and
                                  *
                        t
              identically distributed.
              In this case, it can be seen that ∆y = y  – y = α  Thus, the first difference of y  does not have a time-
                                               t
                                                   t-1
                                                                                   t
                                                        1
              trend incorporated into it.
              Granger  and  Newbold  (1974)  argued  that  the  “levels”  of  many  economic  time-series  are
              integrated or nearly so. As a result, if such data are used in a regression model a high R2 value
   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51