Page 34 - ES 2020-21_Volume-1-2 [28-01-21]
P. 34

Saving Lives and Livelihoods Amidst a Once-in-a-Century Crisis  17


             identified  –  places  with  higher  confirmed  cases  increasing  the  prospect  of  contagion.   This
             strategy was increasingly adopted for intensive interventions at the local level as the national
             lockdown was eased. This enabled a smooth transition to ‘Jaan bhi aur Jahan bhi’.
             1.28  The analysis in the chapter makes it evident that India was successful in flattening the
             pandemic curve, pushing the peak to September. India managed to save millions of ‘lives’ and
             outperform pessimistic expectations in terms of cases and deaths. It is the only country other
             than Argentina that has not experienced a second wave. It has among the lowest fatality rates
             despite having the second largest number of confirmed cases. The recovery rate has been almost
             96 per cent. India, therefore, seems to have managed the health aspect of COVID-19 well.

             EFFICACY OF INITIAL LOCKDOWN IN  CONTROLLING  THE
             PANDEMIC

             1.29  COVID-19 prompted a wide range of responses from governments around the world. The
             Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker (OxCGRT), provides a systematic way to track
             government responses to COVID-19 across countries.  Common lockdowns used included school
             closings,  travel  restrictions,  bans  on  public  gatherings,  emergency  investments  in  healthcare
             facilities, new forms of social welfare provision, contact tracing, wide scale testing and other
             interventions to contain the spread of the virus, augment health systems, and manage the economic
             consequences of these actions. However, government policy responses have varied substantially—
             both across countries, and often within countries—in the measures that they have adopted and how
             quickly they have adopted them. As is evident from Figure 11, the policy response in top major
             five affected countries varied over time. India imposed the most stringent lockdown (equal to 100
             as per the index) for around a period of forty days from late March to early May – this was when
             it had total cases of only around 500-600 cases. As a comparison, stringency in US was around 72
             only during that period when it already had 1 lakh cases. As on date, India has a declining trend in
             daily new cases which has dropped below 20,000 and lowest CFR despite having second largest
             number of total cases. US is still seeing around 2 lakh daily new cases.

                          Figure 11: Variations in Stringency of Lockdowns in Top 5 Countries


























             Source: Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker – data as on 31  December, 2020
                                                                         st
   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39